Homelessness

Published April 6, 2026

If you spend enough time serving meals at a community center, you start to notice how much words matter. As a volunteer at the OFH Soup Kitchen, I have the privilege of sharing coffee and conversations with dozens of wonderful people every week. Over the years, I have noticed a shift in the language we use to describe our guests who do not have a permanent place to sleep.

You might have noticed this change too. The news, local leaders, and community organizers increasingly use terms like “unhoused” or “houseless” instead of the traditional word “homeless.”

This shift can sometimes feel confusing. You might wonder which word is correct or worry about saying the wrong thing. Our goal here is not to police your vocabulary. Instead, we want to explore the debate of unhoused vs homeless to help you understand why these changes are happening.

Language shapes how we see the world. By exploring these evolving terms, we can better understand the real people behind the labels and learn how to offer more meaningful support.

The Deep Impact of the Words We Choose

Words hold incredible power. They can lift someone up or push them down. The words we use to describe a group of people directly affect our attitudes, assumptions, and actions toward them.

Think about how a medical diagnosis is communicated. We no longer define people entirely by their illness. We separate the person from the medical condition to protect their dignity. Advocacy groups have taught us that labels generate strong emotional reactions. These reactions can sometimes build walls instead of bridges.

The same principle applies to poverty and housing. When we use words that focus on a person’s deficits, we risk reinforcing harmful stereotypes. We might accidentally suggest that an individual’s situation is a permanent part of their identity.

Changing our language does not automatically put roofs over heads or food on tables. However, it does change the way we approach the problem. More respectful language leads to more positive attitudes, which eventually lead to better community action.

Unpacking the Word “Homeless”

For decades, “homeless” has been the standard word used by governments, researchers, and everyday people. You will still see it widely used today. So, why do some advocates argue against it?

The answer lies in the difference between a “house” and a “home.”

A home is much more than a physical structure. Your home is your community. It includes your loved ones, your pets, your personal traditions, and your cherished memories. It is where your heart is. We experience homesickness when we miss our community, not when we miss our drywall and shingles.

When we call someone “homeless,” we imply that they have no community and no roots. But my friends at the soup kitchen absolutely have homes. They form deep bonds with one another. They look out for each other, share resources, and create vibrant communities. They have homes; they are simply missing houses.

Unhoused vs Homeless: Shifting the Focus

This brings us to the rise of words like “unhoused” and “houseless.” Many activists and community members prefer these terms because they point directly to the actual problem.

A house is a physical building. It has a roof, walls, heating, and plumbing. When we say someone is “unhoused,” we highlight the lack of a physical structure. We emphasize that the person is simply without a building to live in.

This simple swap in terminology changes the narrative. It reminds society that we are dealing with a severe housing shortage and a crisis of affordability. It shifts the blame away from the individual. It shows that the problem is a structural failure of the housing market, rather than a personal failure of the individual.

These terms also give back a sense of dignity. They acknowledge that a person can still possess a rich community life and a sense of belonging, even if they currently sleep outside.

The Power of Person-First Language

While the debate of unhoused vs homeless is important, many experts suggest taking a different approach entirely. They advocate for using the phrase “people experiencing homelessness.”

This is known as person-first language. It puts the human being before their current circumstances. They are a parent, a veteran, a young adult, or a child first. Their lack of stable housing is just an experience they are currently going through.

I love this phrase because it frames the situation as temporary. Homelessness is something that happens to someone. It is not who they are. It is a problem they are facing, and problems can be solved.

When we say “a homeless person,” the condition sounds permanent and defining. When we say “a person experiencing homelessness,” we recognize their humanity. We acknowledge that they just need a bit of help to overcome a hurdle.

The Hidden Reality of Housing Insecurity

It is also important to remember that this crisis looks different for everyone. When most people hear these terms, they picture someone sleeping on a sidewalk or in a tent. But that is only a fraction of the story.

A massive amount of this crisis is completely hidden from public view. Families might live in motels because they cannot afford a security deposit. Teenagers might couch-surf, bouncing between friends’ living rooms. People might sleep in their cars in dark parking lots.

This is where the term “housing insecurity” becomes very useful. Housing insecurity covers the entire spectrum of housing struggles. It includes people who are severely rent-burdened, meaning they spend almost all their income on rent.

These individuals live on a razor’s edge. A single unexpected medical bill, a reduction in work hours, or a flat tire could cost them their apartment. Using terms like housing insecurity helps us address the root causes of the crisis before someone ends up on the street.